Argument for the Existence of God :: Religion, Theology

     The following paper will give a sound contention for the presence of God. By exhibiting that an Atheist world can't represent the preconditions of the laws of rationale an Atheist can't represent a normal banter concerning the presence of God.      â€Å"The inconceivability of the contrary†, the best and just verification that the nesesary truth of the presence of God is his disclosure of himself to us that makes it feasible for us to utilize rationale. This could be interpreted, utilizing as it were nessesary facts, into the type of:      L: (laws of rationale)      G: (God exists)  â â â â if L involves G L  â â â â â â â â â â â â â â ================  â â â â â â â â â â â â â â G Rationale is â€Å"the laws of thinking that God has established.† If God has set up these laws of thinking that we call rationale at that point how could the Atheist framework represent the laws of rationale. First they are irrelevant and general, and how might anything be able to insignificant and all inclusive be represented in a naturalistic (matter just) universe. Second if God has set up these laws of thinking then there would be no skepticism. An Atheist needs to have faith parents in law of rationale which are all inclusive in application, however so as to get away from a definitive ramifications of this thought ( there is a God who forces all inclusive norms of reason.), the Atheist will attempt to keep up that the â€Å"laws of logic† are just â€Å" conventions† of general understanding among them. This is rationally non- satisfactory, if rationale were just a question of show, it would be incomprehensible